MINUTES
OCTOBER 3, 2007
A
Regular Meeting of the Flushing Planning Commission was called to order by
Chairperson Robert Matsko on October 3,
2007 at 7:30 P.M. at City Hall.
Present: Dennis Bueche
Kevin Keane
Ron Johnson
Robert Matsko
Dan Borgerding
C Neil Blackmore
Jack Owens
John
Olson
John
Gault
Absent: None
Also Present: Dennis Bow, City
Manager
Marlene C. Stone, Deputy
Clerk
Douglas Piggott, Rowe Planner
Pledge
of Allegiance:
Approval of Minutes: JUNE
26, 2007 (SPECIAL MEETING)
MOTION
by Olson, supported by Gault, to approve the
minutes of June 26, 2007 as written.
Yea: 8
Nay: 0
Motion carried.
(Kevin Keane arrived at 7:38 p.m.)
Meeting
open for public comments:
Terry Reechko
Meeting
closed for public comments:
MINUTES
OCTOBER 3, 2007
PAGE 2
New Business: POSSIBLE
AMENDMENT TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE
(ELECTRONIC
SIGNS)
MOTION by
Keane, supported by Olson, to recommend City Council set
up a Committee to revisit the sign ordinance to address possible changes
with regard to new technology in a changing community.
Yea: 9
Nay: 0
Motion carried.
Discussion:
1. Traffic
safety.
2. Flashing
lights in the evening near residential homes.
3. Frequency
of message changes.
4. Size
& height.
5. Allow
in certain Zoning districts.
6. School
signage – may want a legal opinion because of court decisions.
MINUTES
OCTOBER 3, 2007
PAGE 3
New Business: SET
A PUBLIC HEARING – SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH SITE
PLAN – DELEHANTY PROJECT
(Pending
final submission of plan)
Discussion:
·
Mr. Bow advised the
Commission that Mr. Delehanty will be submitting a request to expand parking
cars on three lots adjacent to the car dealership. (One lot to the east and two
to the west.) Mr. Delehanty later stated
they were only interested in parking cars on the two properties to the
west. Mr. Bow advised the Commission
that at present the ordinance would only allow for one car to be parked on each
lot.
·
Mr. Bow advised the
Commission that the Ordinance site plan requirements are quite detailed and
asked them to address how much detail they will need. The Commission has some discretion on the
amount of detail needed. (The ordinance requires such items as drainage,
adjacent properties, fencing, signs etc.)
Mr. Bow believes we would not need engineering/drainage on the plan
because the property drainage is already established and would not be
changed. We will need to address signs
not in compliance by variance or removal.
General Discussion: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
December 3, 2007
meeting.
Adjournment:
MOTION by Gault, supported by
Borgerding, to adjourn.
Yea: 9
Nay: 0
Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
mcs